• Home
  • Services
    • Employment Law
    • Corporate & Commercial Law
      • Business or Share Sale & Purchase
      • Business Finance
      • Joint Ventures & Co-Ownership Agreements
      • Commercial (Contracts, Policies & Terms)
      • Corporate Restructuring
      • Privacy
      • Technology & IP
    • Property Law
      • Commercial Conveyancing
      • Residential Conveyancing
      • Residential Property Financing
      • Subdivisions & Land Developments
    • Trusts & Succession
      • Trust Establishment
      • Trusts Administration
      • Wills
      • Powers of Attorney
    • Family Law
      • Legal Aid & Family Legal Aid Advice Service
      • Adoption
      • Family Violence
      • Caring of Children
      • Relationship Property Agreements
    • Immigration Law
      • Visa Applications
    • Estates
      • Estates Administration
      • Advising Beneficiaries
      • Estates Litigation & Claims
    • Elder Law
      • Retirement Villages
      • Reverse Equity Mortgages
      • PPPR Applications
    • Insolvency & Debt Recovery
      • Corporate Insolvency
      • Debt Recovery
  • Meet The Team
    • Our Team
    • Join The Team
      • Current Vacancies
  • Resources
  • Payment
  • Blog
  • Contact
Changes to Credit Laws
April 20, 2012
The Dark Side Of Mortgagee Sales
May 20, 2012

Defamation

May 20, 2012
Categories
  • Miscellaneous
Tags
  • Disputes
  • Miscellaneous
Defamation claims have been a topic of interest lately with high profile figures such as Chris Cairns and Judith Collins taking legal action against attacks made on their reputations. A brief summary of defamation law in New Zealand and the main points that are needed to pursue or defend a defamation claim are set out below.

What is Defamation?

Defamation in New Zealand is governed by the Defamation Act 1992 and an entrenched body of case law. It is an area of law that is designed to protect a person’s reputation against unjustifiable attack. Providing such protection requires a fine balance between the protection of reputation and the freedom of expression as contained in Section 14 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.

Proving Defamation

A defamatory statement can be in either written or verbal form. To be successful, the plaintiff must prove they have been defamed by proving the following three elements:

  1. a defamatory statement has been made,
  2. the statement was about the plaintiff, and
  3. the statement has been published by the defendant.

Publication is a crucial aspect of this test. It must be proven that the defamatory statement was published to at least one person other than the plaintiff. If the statement was published to the plaintiff alone then the test for publication will fail. Publication of defamatory statements includes the making of verbal statements.

Defending Defamation

The four defences in a defamation case are:

  1. Honest opinion – the defendant must provide the factual basis on which their opinion is based. This defence will not succeed if the defendant simply got the information wrong,
  2. Truth – a complete defence is provided if the defendant can satisfy the court that the defamatory statement was true, or not materially different from the truth,
  3. Privilege – privilege provides immunity to certain groups of society for statements or reports made by them. “Absolute privilege” will serve as a complete defence; an example is where politicians often defame each other in parliament but are protected by parliamentary privilege. “Qualified privilege” however can be defeated if the plaintiff is able to show that the defamatory statements were motivated by malice. Qualified privilege usually attaches to the requirement for fair and accurate reporting by, for example, the media or someone with a social, moral or legal duty or interest to report something,
  4. Consent – a complete defence is available if it can be established that the plaintiff consented to the publication of the defamatory material.

Defamation and the Internet

Given the prevalence of the internet in our daily lives, caution must be taken to ensure that statements made online are not defamatory. The recent English case of Chris Cairns against Lalit Modi was the first of its kind in England where a ‘tweet’ made on the social networking site Twitter was held to be defamation. The resulting award in damages was equal to approximately £3,750 per word for a 24 word publication. Although this case was decided in England, it provides a valuable lesson in terms of publications on social networking sites. (At the time of writing, it was reported that Mr Modi would be appealing the decision).

Related posts

February 15, 2021

The Key to Performance Development


Read more
December 15, 2020

Employers Beware: The Perils of Work Christmas Parties


Read more
Anti-Money Laundering
July 30, 2018

Anti-Money Laundering Requirements


Read more
Wakefields Lawyers

CONTACT US

04 970 3600
info@wakefieldslaw.com

FOLLOW US

BLOG SIGN UP

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MENU

  • Privacy Policy
  • Website Terms of Use
  • Terms of Engagement
© 2022 Wakefields Lawyers Limited. All Rights Reserved. Wellington SEO by Media Giant.
  • Home
  • Services
  • Meet The Team
  • Resources
  • Payment
  • Blog
  • Contact