• Home
  • Services
    • Employment Law
    • Corporate & Commercial Law
      • Business or Share Sale & Purchase
      • Business Finance
      • Joint Ventures & Co-Ownership Agreements
      • Commercial (Contracts, Policies & Terms)
      • Corporate Restructuring
      • Privacy
      • Technology & IP
    • Property Law
      • Commercial Conveyancing
      • Residential Conveyancing
      • Residential Property Financing
      • Subdivisions & Land Developments
    • Trusts & Succession
      • Trust Establishment
      • Trusts Administration
      • Wills
      • Powers of Attorney
    • Family Law
      • Legal Aid & Family Legal Aid Advice Service
      • Adoption
      • Family Violence
      • Caring of Children
      • Relationship Property Agreements
    • Immigration Law
      • Visa Applications
    • Estates
      • Estates Administration
      • Advising Beneficiaries
      • Estates Litigation & Claims
    • Elder Law
      • Retirement Villages
      • Reverse Equity Mortgages
      • PPPR Applications
    • Insolvency & Debt Recovery
      • Corporate Insolvency
      • Debt Recovery
  • About Us
    • Your Team
  • Resources
  • Payment
  • Blog
  • Contact
Disclosure To Your Insurer – Your Duty
March 18, 2014
Proposed Changes To Trust Law
March 18, 2014

Health & Safety Reform

March 18, 2014
Categories
  • Employment Law
  • Miscellaneous
Tags
  • Employment
  • Small Business

The Health and Safety Reform Bill (‘Bill’) proposes amendments to our current health and safety regime. One proposal is the replacement of the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992, with a new Health and Safety at Work Act (‘proposed Act’). Below is a summary of the three major proposed changes for employers.

Duties Of A “Person Conducting A Business Or Undertaking” (‘PCBU’)

The proposed Act introduces the broad concept of a PCBU to cover the many different working relationships in the New Zealand workplace. It follows the Australian health and safety model, and requires a PCBU to ensure the health and safety of their workers and other people affected, as far as is “reasonably practicable”, replacing the current requirement to take “all practicable steps”.   “Reasonably practicable” means, “that which is, or was, at a particular time, reasonably able to be done in relation to ensuring health and safety, taking into account and weighing up all relevant matters”, and the proposed Act also outlines relevant matters for consideration. It is considered that this will provide PCBUs with greater clarity as to their duties.

The proposed Act also introduces the concept of an officer of a PCBU. People who come under the definition of an officer include:

  • directors of a company;
  • partners in a partnership;
  • people making decisions affecting the whole or a substantial part of the business of a PCBU; and
  • people in similar positions to a director or partner.

Officers will be under a positive and personal duty to undertake necessary due diligence and ensure the PCBU complies with its health and safety obligations. Employers and others who come under the definition of an officer will need to take particular care to ensure they make the positive steps necessary to fulfill this duty.

Worker Consultation

The proposed Act promotes worker participation in health and safety in the workplace. It requires all PCBUs to have worker participation practices – at present this is only a requirement where there are 30 or more employees, or where an employee or union has requested it. The PCBU can satisfy this requirement by having a health and safety representative elected, or having a health and safety committee established.

Health and safety representatives have powers outlined under the proposed Act. For example, they can issue provisional improvement notices. At present, only health and safety inspectors can do this. This will change workplace health and safety dynamics, as a member of staff will now have the same power as an independent inspector to require health and safety changes to be made in the workplace. PCBUs may also request that an inspector – who may confirm, change or cancel the notice – be appointed to review a notice.

Harsher Penalties For Breachers

The proposed Act increases the maximum penalty for offending by a body corporate to a fine of $3,000,000 – while, for an individual, the maximum penalties are a fine of $600,000 and/or 5 years imprisonment.

The Bill is expected to be introduced to Parliament early this year, where it will begin the select committee process, and related public consultation. This process may see amendments made to the proposed Act, which at this stage is scheduled to come into force by 1 April 2015.

Related posts

February 15, 2021

The Key to Performance Development


Read more
December 15, 2020

Employers Beware: The Perils of Work Christmas Parties


Read more
November 6, 2020

Equal Pay Amendments Now in Force!


Read more
Wakefields Lawyers

CONTACT US

04 970 3600
info@wakefieldslaw.com

FOLLOW US

NEWSLETTER SIGN UP

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MENU

  • Privacy Policy
  • Website Terms of Use
  • Terms of Engagement
© 2020 Wakefields Lawyers. All Rights Reserved. Wellington SEO by Media Giant.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Resources
  • Payment
  • Blog
  • Contact